“There haven’t been any final decisions as of yet on which approach ACTIV will take,” NIH spokeswoman Renate Myles told CNN in an email.
Members of ACTIV’s clinical trials working group are expected to discuss the options on a call Wednesday. Those members include representatives from the vaccine companies.
“I’m hoping we’ll have more to share in the coming weeks since things are moving very quickly,” Myles wrote.
Bioethicist Art Caplan said it’s unprecedented that a plan for competing US vaccine companies to work together in one large trial is even being considered.
“This is all very recent,” he said.
Three US companies are already testing their vaccines on humans, according to the World Health Organization. They’re still in phase 1 or phase 2 trials, which typically involve giving the vaccine to dozens or hundreds of study subjects.
Moderna, based in Massachusetts, is working on a vaccine with the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, a part of the NIH. Pfizer is working with German company BioNTech, and Pennsylvania-based Inovio is also in clinical trials.
Phase 3 of vaccine trials typically involve thousands of study subjects, some of whom are randomly assigned to get the vaccine, and others who are randomly assigned to be injected with a placebo, a substance that does nothing. The researchers then wait and see if there is a difference in Covid-19 infections rates between the vaccine group and the control group.
If the vaccine developers band together in one large phase 3 trial of all of their experimental vaccines, they could all use the same placebo group and wouldn’t have to recruit their own.
“Certainly, this is the most efficient way to do it,” said Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, and a member of the ACTIV group.
But another member said there are advantages to each company doing its own trial, since each company is currently at a different stage.
“One trial is going to start in July for sure and another in late summer and another in September and another in October,” said Dr. Lawrence Corey, president and director emeritus of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, and a member of the ACTIV group.
Caplan said each trial method has advantages and disadvantages.
“It’s not like, ‘Holy cow, you can’t do it this way or you’ve got to do it that way,'” he said.
Corey said the overall effort — several vaccine companies working this fast — is unprecedented.
“I don’t think in all of history there’s ever been an infectious disease that infected more people in such a short time,” he said.
Whatever route is taken for the trials, Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, on Monday dispelled any hope that a vaccine would be ready by autumn.
“The idea of having treatments available or a vaccine to facilitate the re-entry of students into the fall term would be something that would be a bridge too far,” he told senators at a hearing. “Even at the top speed we’re going, we don’t see a vaccine playing in the ability of individuals to get to school this term.”
He did mention that if a vaccine turns out to be successful in the trials, “we hope to know that in the late fall or early winter.”
Fauci made it clear that it’s possible a vaccine might not even work.
“There’s no guarantee that the vaccine is actually going to be effective,” he said.
He then added that he felt “cautiously optimistic that we will have a candidate that will give some degree of efficacy.”