As schools reopen across the United States and children attending school test positive for the coronavirus, getting students back to school safely continues to be at the forefront of many people’s minds.
“However, as many school districts face budgetary constraints, schools must evaluate their options and identify measures that are particularly important and feasible for their communities,” said authors from the Division of General Pediatrics at Stanford University School of Medicine in a commentary published Tuesday in JAMA Pediatrics.
The authors offered a number of suggestions on how the AAP guidelines can be used in schools to make reopening as safe as possible.
School districts, the experts suggested, should create Covid-19 task forces that are made up of key stakeholders, including superintendents and parents, to develop procedures and policies for safety.
The authors addressed physical distancing, personal protective equipment and fixed cohorts of students and teachers — all things that are covered in the AAP guidelines.
“The AAP guidance states the importance of identifying symptoms and signs concerning for Covid-19 but does not discuss operational approaches in depth,” the authors said. The AAP guidelines also don’t include an approach for testing, they said.
The authors recommended a three-pronged testing approach, carried out in collaboration with local hospitals.
Firstly, all students with symptoms should be tested. Secondly, schools should conduct random staff and student testing to identify asymptomatic patients. Thirdly, students from high-risk households should be offered testing more frequently.
The authors also discussed the need for schools to continually be flexible, with plans in place for virtual learning and the potential need for extra nurses, psychologists and social workers in schools.
“In summary, to maximize health and educational outcomes, school districts should adopt some or all of the measures on the AAP guidance and prioritize them after considering local Covid-19 incidence, key stakeholder input, and budgetary constraints,” the authors said.
Another option for reopening schools is virtual learning — something that comes with its own considerations, according to authors from the University of Florida College of Medicine’s department of pediatrics and the Research Center for Educational Technology at Kent State University, who published a separate commentary in JAMA Pediatrics on Tuesday.
Online learning isn’t new
While Covid-19 led to many American students and educators being unexpectedly introduced to virtual learning, it has been around since the mid-1990s, according to the authors.
“While more than a billion children worldwide newly experienced this pandemic related abrupt transition to online education, at least 2% of US students and many more globally had already been participating in online instruction from K-12 online or virtual schools,” the authors said.
Like in-person learning, virtual learning also comes with many options, including for-profit, charter and public options — something that parents need to consider and research as they look into virtual learning.
It doesn’t work for all students or all families, the authors noted. Factors such as access to the internet can cause “significant variation” in student success. However, research has suggested that virtual learning can be beneficial for students with special health care needs.
Parents should assess the characteristics of their children and understand the virtual school options that are available to them, the authors noted.
“The pandemic has encouraged many parents to explore educational alternatives, particularly for students who may have health concerns such as those with respiratory disease or who are immunocompromised,” the authors said. “With social distancing creating obstacles for traditional education, K-12 online learning may become more mainstream.”
CNN’s Jen Christensen, Lauren Mascarenhas, Christina Maxouris and Sandee LaMotte contributed to this story.